FROM THE HEART: I’m Confused
Author
Brad Offman
Date
June 17, 2026
I'm confused.
I'm confused because I don't seem to understand the meaning of anything anymore. In our space, terms get tossed around like baseballs at a little league game. Heck, we're not even sure what to call charities anymore. Are they charities? Registered charities? Non-profits? Not-for-profit organizations (NPOs)? Voluntary sector organizations? Or, my favourite, qualified donees?
You get the picture. When we use different terms to describe the same thing, we might actually not even be speaking the same language. Using shared language creates a strong foundation for rich discussion. We face an even greater challenge in our world, where terms are often used interchangeably and sometimes mean very different things.
Is community investment the same as corporate giving? How does corporate philanthropy differ from corporate citizenship? What about CSR, ESG, and NSYNC? (Wanted to see if you're paying attention). Do they all mean the same thing, or are we conflating one with the other? Does it matter, as long as the company is doing good and not causing harm?
And then there's purpose, perhaps the most misunderstood word of all. Purpose-led, purpose-driven, purpose, purpose, purpose. What's the deal with purpose?
We know that companies with a true social purpose have defined the very reason why they exist. A social purpose serves as a guiding light, informing business strategy and foundational decisions. But if a company doesn't have a social purpose, or is conflating purpose with other CSR-like activities, are we to dismiss them, or scoff at their intentions?
The answer? Absolutely not.
Movements have all kinds of members and the social purpose movement is no exception. At the top, a movement has its founders, zealots, and die-hard adherents. It also has strong believers who can serve as ambassadors or advocates. But I think that, with most movements, the majority of supporters are those who are neither die-hard nor overly zealous. They are interested, supportive, and ideologically aligned. They want to learn more.
And in my view, a truly strong and sustainable movement does not require its members to abide strictly by its fundamental principles. In the purpose world, this means that its strongest adherents can serve as a beacon for those who want to learn and improve. It also means that its newer (and perhaps lesser) supporters can influence and shape the movement as it grows.
Maybe that's the point. We spend so much time debating labels that we sometimes forget to bring more people into the conversation.
I wonder if anyone is reading this. Do people read freeform articles anymore? Send me your World Series predictions at
brad@greaterpurpose.inc. Will the Jays make it back in?












